tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7506249.post113339461474368341..comments2023-11-05T04:43:31.501-05:00Comments on Kenneth Anderson's Law of War and Just War Theory Blog: White phosphorousUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7506249.post-1133549802452970312005-12-02T13:56:00.000-05:002005-12-02T13:56:00.000-05:00Ken -- Thank you for your reference to my article....Ken -- Thank you for your reference to my article. I am very happy to have it reprinted on your site. AnthonyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7506249.post-1133464237192197422005-12-01T14:10:00.000-05:002005-12-01T14:10:00.000-05:00Anonymous, above, alas illustrating the limitation...Anonymous, above, alas illustrating the limitations of wikipedia as a reference work.KAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12757193337906082576noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7506249.post-1133406787692104862005-11-30T22:13:00.000-05:002005-11-30T22:13:00.000-05:00"Bottom line as a law of war matter on white posph..."Bottom line as a law of war matter on white posphorous:"<BR/><BR/>What law? Jungle law? <BR/><BR/>If used by your enemy, against whom your are trying to find a pretext, WP is a chemical weapon. If WP is used against said enemy, it is an "incendiary device", like a candle, let's say.<BR/><BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_phosphorus_incendiary<BR/><BR/>Some of the stuff you people come up with is laughable, far more ridiculous than the meaning of the word "is". Case in point - 'They aren't prisoners of war, they are enemy combatants'. <BR/><BR/>We have learned much since the Vietnam war. Not anything about justice, about morality or ethics, but rather how to get money from the lobbyists, squash the press, pump out the propaganda, and have the shylocks make it all legal. <BR/><BR/>Nice job, people. Keep up the bad work.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com